Regarding staggered intermittent fillet welds, which statement is true?

Regarding staggered intermittent fillet welds, which statement is true?

• A. The length is continuous.
• B. There is arrow side significance.
• C. There is no arrow side significance.
• D. The symbol represents a continuous weld.

Answer: (C)

Staggered intermittent fillet welds show individual short welds placed at intervals along the joint, rather than one long continuous weld. The pattern itself doesn’t assign any special meaning to which side of the joint is the arrow side—the arrangement is about spacing and alternation of welds, not about arrow-side significance. That’s why the statement that there is no arrow side significance is the best choice: the welds are discrete and the staggered layout defines their distribution, while the arrow side does not carry a unique meaning in this context. The other options imply a continuous weld or a continuous length, which isn’t correct for intermittent welds, and they misstate the symbol’s representation.

Staggered intermittent fillet welds show individual short welds placed at intervals along the joint, rather than one long continuous weld. The pattern itself doesn’t assign any special meaning to which side of the joint is the arrow side—the arrangement is about spacing and alternation of welds, not about arrow-side significance. That’s why the statement that there is no arrow side significance is the best choice: the welds are discrete and the staggered layout defines their distribution, while the arrow side does not carry a unique meaning in this context. The other options imply a continuous weld or a continuous length, which isn’t correct for intermittent welds, and they misstate the symbol’s representation.